There are only few things which I can tell about Robin Hood . We all know his life and legend but through movies he was shown in many different visions.
Looks like he is old story in movies and that he will enter in classic but then we got new and really different Robin Hood . This movies are one of the most adventurous movies in history . Maybe it was big risk to take this theme but Ridley Scott knows how to make spectacle of the movie .
There are many exciting things about this movie . In waiting for movie premiere we could hear a lot of things like this Robin Hood is trash and it isn't following history of Robin Hood . But people were naive and before watching this movie they believed in this fake facts . I think that this movie deserved better critics . Actually,what happened to a critics ?
 |
| Robin Hood |
Ridley Scott as director is known by Gladiator and his sense for this kind of movies and his fighting scenes really have sense . I think that his decision was very good and he wanted to show one really known story . As the result he could realize that people don't know how story really is . His smart directing made this movie .
Maybe movie is missing a few adventurous parts and sometimes he desperately put some parts . I don't think that his showing of history was the best . Maybe Merry Men were sometimes without real spirit from other movies . Ridley showed that he knows how to show already seen theme on one modern,great and effective way .
Russel Crowe as Robin Hood was great . Whole cast played very well . Russel Crowe really knows how to mix different roles and he is master for it . His sense for these fighting scenes and for love scenes is impressive . I don't think that he was bad . He was very disciplined during whole movie and I can't see some problems.
He was very inspired and he was serious and his strong performance is really stunning . I couldn't believe when I saw him in fight scenes because his wildness and great action acting were great fact . I don't know why he was attacked because of this movie and accent . I think that he doesn't look like some British hero but he doesn't look ridiculous like former movies .
Cate Blanchett as Lady Marion wasn't maybe the best because of her demanding role . Her role was maybe different and she wasn't like Audrey Hepburn but her appearance was really good . Maybe director wanted too much from her role but she showed how this difference can be positive .
He improved vision of her role with one convincing role . I think that I am surprised because I didn't think that she will do this so well and that she could act one female hero or better to say one example of good female character .
Max Von Sydow as Walter Loaxley was very good and he had great spirit during the acting . I think that he was very good and with his experience this movie got one new division . His great acting showed how he has got sense for this roles.
Mark Strong as Godfrey was very good villain and I think that he has got great and provocative acting . Maybe he sometimes looked aloof but when we see how complicated is his role we can tell "Nicely done !" . William Hurt as William Marshall wasn't so good as others because his role was totally different .
He didn't find himself so well as others so he sometimes was out of pace . Oscar Isaac was maybe bad because of his constantly aloof acting and sometimes he looked very childish . I think that he didn't have so strong performance for this role . Danny Houston was pretty good and he had very strong performance and his wise acting was damn good .
When we look everything I think that Ridley Scott didn't miss theme . He showed how imagination can be powerful . Cast was great and fighting scenes absolutely stunning and great . All in one . Great movie .
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét